Criteria of good demand forecasting system
There are thus, a good many ways to make a guess about future sales. They show contrast in cost, flexibility and the adequate skills and sophistication. Therefore, there is a problem of choosing the best method for a particular demand situation.
There are certain economic criteria of broader applicability. They are:
(i) Accuracy, (ii) Plausibility, (iii) Durability, (iv) Flexibility, (v) Availability, (vi) Economy, (vii) Simplicity and (viii) Consistency.
(i) Accuracy:
The forecast obtained must be accurate. How is an accurate forecast possible? To obtain an accurate forecast, it is essential to check the accuracy of past forecasts against present performance and of present forecasts against future performance. Accuracy cannot be tested by precise measurement but buy judgment.
(ii) Plausibility:
The executive should have good understanding of the technique chosen and they should have confidence in the techniques used. Understanding is also needed for a proper interpretation of results. Plausibility requirements can often improve the accuracy of results.
(iii) Durability:
Unfortunately, a demand function fitted to past experience may back cost very greatly and still fall apart in a short time as a forecaster. The durability of the forecasting power of a demand function depends partly on the reasonableness and simplicity of functions fitted, but primarily on the stability of the understanding relationships measured in the past. Of course, the importance of durability determines the allowable cost of the forecast.
(iv) Flexibility:
Flexibility can be viewed as an alternative to generality. A long lasting function could be set up in terms of basic natural forces and human motives. Even though fundamental, it would nevertheless be hard to measure and thus not very useful. A set of variables whose co-efficient could be adjusted from time to time to meet changing conditions in more practical way to maintain intact the routine procedure of forecasting.
(v) Availability:
Immediate availability of data is a vital requirement and the search for reasonable approximations to relevance in late data is a constant strain on the forecasters patience. The techniques employed should be able to produce meaningful results quickly. Delay in result will adversely affect the managerial decisions.
(vi) Economy:
Cost is a primary consideration which should be weighted against the importance of the forecasts to the business operations. A question may arise: How much money and managerial effort should be allocated to obtain a high level of forecasting accuracy? The criterion here is the economic consideration.
(vii) Simplicity:
Statistical and econometric models are certainly useful but they are intolerably complex. To those executives who have a fear of mathematics, these methods would appear to be Latin or Greek. The procedure should, therefore, be simple and easy so that the management may appreciate and understand why it has been adopted by the forecaster.
(viii) Consistency:
The forecaster has to deal with various components which are independent. If he does not make an adjustment in one component to bring it in line with a forecast of another, he would achieve a whole which would appear consistent.
Conclusion:
In fine, the ideal forecasting method is one that yields returns over cost with accuracy, seems reasonable, can be formalised for reasonably long periods, can meet new circumstances adeptly and can give up-to-date results. The method of forecasting is not the same for all products.
Comments
Post a Comment